mhc class ii antibody Search Results


93
Bio-Rad anti mhc ii
Anti Mhc Ii, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/us08124067-154-11-14?v=Bio-Rad
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mhc ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
R&D Systems anti mhc class i
Anti Mhc Class I, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pmc03087837-106-48-61?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mhc class i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bio X Cell w6 32 n a bxcell be0079
W6 32 N A Bxcell Be0079, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pm36550781-48-234-236?v=Bio+X+Cell
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
w6 32 n a bxcell be0079 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

92
Bio X Cell anti h 2k b
Anti H 2k B, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pmc05846477-501-4-7?v=Bio+X+Cell
Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti h 2k b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
92/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio X Cell mhc i
Mhc I, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pmc12715064-49-22-24?v=Bio+X+Cell
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mhc i - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bio X Cell invivomab anti mouse mhc class ii
Invivomab Anti Mouse Mhc Class Ii, supplied by Bio X Cell, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pm35216666-277-0-21?v=Bio+X+Cell
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
invivomab anti mouse mhc class ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cytek Biosciences apc cyanine7 anti mouse mhc class ii i a i e
Apc Cyanine7 Anti Mouse Mhc Class Ii I A I E, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pm41923630-611-34-33?v=Cytek+Biosciences
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc cyanine7 anti mouse mhc class ii i a i e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals mhc ii
Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where <t>MHC</t> <t>II</t> + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).
Mhc Ii, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pmc12498547-2-0-3?v=Novus+Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mhc ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Novus Biologicals anti mhc class ii
Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where <t>MHC</t> <t>II</t> + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).
Anti Mhc Class Ii, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pm28447277-48-20-24?v=Novus+Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mhc class ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Rockland Immunochemicals rabbit anti beta 2 microglobulin
Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where <t>MHC</t> <t>II</t> + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).
Rabbit Anti Beta 2 Microglobulin, supplied by Rockland Immunochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pmc03359668-59-14-16?v=Rockland+Immunochemicals
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti beta 2 microglobulin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech hla dra
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
Hla Dra, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pmc12983932-280-32-33?v=Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hla dra - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Elabscience Biotechnology major histocompatibility complex class ii mchii e ab f0990e
M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages <t>(HLA-DRA</t> + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.
Major Histocompatibility Complex Class Ii Mchii E Ab F0990e, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/mhc+class+ii+antibody/pmc12547123-93-22-29?v=Elabscience+Biotechnology
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
major histocompatibility complex class ii mchii e ab f0990e - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where MHC II + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).

Journal: Biology of reproduction

Article Title: Identification and characterization of a novel CD2-positive cell population in the seminiferous tubule of Fischer CDF344 rats

doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf162

Figure Lengend Snippet: Confocal photomicrographs taken at 60× magnification, seminiferous tubules collected from the corn oil–treated rats utilized for the staining and microscopy, and colored text on the image refers to the immunolabeled entity. (A–D) CD2 cells + are present within the PTMC layer, and their cell shape is irregular; primarily, the CD2 + cells’ shape is determined by the cellular space between the PTMCs. Arrow marks highlight the spot of the empty cellular space between the PTMCs where CD2 + cells localize. (E–G) Arrow marks highlight the spot of the cellular space between the PTMCs where MHC II + PTM φ localizes. Based on the characteristic nuclear morphology, the asterisk symbol points to the nucleus, which is presumed to be a CD2 + cell. (H) Cell-to-cell interaction between an MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, blue—nuclei. (H′) Masked and surface rendered image visualizing the type of cellular interaction where the membrane of the CD2 + cell is extended or pinched by the PTM φ , nearly half of the CD2 + cell surface was overlapped with PTM φ surface. (I) Another type of cell-to-cell contact. (I) Surface-rendered image shows a clear cell-to-cell contact between MHC II + PTM φ and CD2 + cell, where the membrane of PTM φ overlaps with the boundary of the CD2 + cell membrane. Scale bar: 15 μ m in (A–G).

Article Snippet: MHC II , Novus Biologicals , NBP3-09015.

Techniques: Staining, Microscopy, Immunolabeling, Membrane

(A, B) Representative confocal photomicrographs of whole mount seminiferous tubules from rats at 48 h post-exposure, green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein, n = 5. (A) Corn oil. (B) MEHP treatment group. (C) Graph presenting the average number of PTM φ per 10 5 area, MEHP-exposed animals showed a significant increase in MHC II + PTM φ s, calculating changes in PTM φ s number with n = 5 rats per treatment group. (D) Representative confocal photomicrograph of whole-mount seminiferous tubules from rats 48 h post-exposure from the corn oil–treated animals (red—CD2 + cells and green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein). (E) A representative confocal photomicrograph from the MEHP treatment. (F) Graph presenting the average ± SEM (standard error of the mean) of PTM φ s-CD2 + cells (red) interaction per 10 5 area. The average number of cellular interactions between the PTM φ s and CD2 + cells increased significantly in the MEHP-exposure group when compared to the corn oil–treated group, ( n = 5/group). Scale bar: 15 μ m applies to all the images in this panel.

Journal: Biology of reproduction

Article Title: Identification and characterization of a novel CD2-positive cell population in the seminiferous tubule of Fischer CDF344 rats

doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf162

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A, B) Representative confocal photomicrographs of whole mount seminiferous tubules from rats at 48 h post-exposure, green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein, n = 5. (A) Corn oil. (B) MEHP treatment group. (C) Graph presenting the average number of PTM φ per 10 5 area, MEHP-exposed animals showed a significant increase in MHC II + PTM φ s, calculating changes in PTM φ s number with n = 5 rats per treatment group. (D) Representative confocal photomicrograph of whole-mount seminiferous tubules from rats 48 h post-exposure from the corn oil–treated animals (red—CD2 + cells and green—PTM φ labeled for MHC II protein). (E) A representative confocal photomicrograph from the MEHP treatment. (F) Graph presenting the average ± SEM (standard error of the mean) of PTM φ s-CD2 + cells (red) interaction per 10 5 area. The average number of cellular interactions between the PTM φ s and CD2 + cells increased significantly in the MEHP-exposure group when compared to the corn oil–treated group, ( n = 5/group). Scale bar: 15 μ m applies to all the images in this panel.

Article Snippet: MHC II , Novus Biologicals , NBP3-09015.

Techniques: Labeling

M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages (HLA-DRA + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: Dual regulation of CXCR6+CD8+ T cells modulates cytotoxic and exhaustion-associated programs during prostate cancer progression

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-014276

Figure Lengend Snippet: M1-like macrophages secrete CXCL16 and support CXCR6 + CD8 + T-cell recruitment but are progressively lost during PCa progression. ( A ) UMAP plot of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells from PCa tissues, identifying five distinct clusters, including an IL1B + macrophage subset. ( B ) Dot plot showing average expression and detection frequency of selected marker genes across macrophage and dendritic cell (DC) clusters. ( C ) Violin plots illustrating the expression of key pro-inflammatory ( IL1B , TLR2 , CD86 ), anti-inflammatory ( CD163 , MRC1 ), and chemokine ( CXCL16 ) genes across myeloid subsets. ( D ) AUCell-based quantification of M1 and M2 gene signatures across clusters; IL1B + macrophages exhibit the highest M1 signature score. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. ( E ) CellChat network visualizing outgoing macrophage-derived signals to CD8 + T-cell subsets; IL1B + macrophages prominently interact with CXCR6 + TEff-like CD8 + T cells. ( F ) Bubble plot visualizing the results of ligand–receptor interaction analysis; CXCL16–CXCR6 axis ranks among the strongest predicted signals. ( G ) Gating strategy for the identification of murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) induced with M-CSF. ( H ) Flow cytometry of BMDMs polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by CD80 and CD206 expression. ( I ) Confocal images of THP-1-derived macrophages stained for CD68 after PMA induction. ( J ) Flow cytometry of THP-1-derived macrophages polarized to M1 (IFN-γ+LPS) or M2 (IL-4) states, assessed by MHC-II and CD206 expression. ( K ) Immunoblots showing higher CXCL16 levels in M1-polarized BMDMs compared with their M2 counterparts. ( L ) ELISA quantification of secreted CXCL16 in the supernatants of M1-polarized and M2-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( M ) Immunoblot analysis demonstrating elevated levels of CXCL16 in M1-polarized THP-1-derived macrophages compared with M2-polarized cells. (N, O). A total of 5×10⁶ TRAMP-C1 cells suspended in 100 µL PBS were subcutaneously implanted into the right flank of 5–6-week-old male WT C57BL/6J mice (n=5 per group). Tumors were harvested at day 35 (early stage) and day 49 (advanced stage) post-inoculation. Flow cytometric analysis of TAMs revealed a significant reduction in the ratio of MHCII + CD206⁻ (M1-like) to MHCII⁻ CD206 + (M2-like) macrophages during tumor progression. Mann-Whitney U test, **p<0.01. ( P ) Multiplex immunohistochemistry of human PCa tissues (GS=3+4 vs GS=5+5) demonstrated spatial proximity between CXCL16 + M1-like macrophages (HLA-DRA + ) and CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells in lower-grade (GS=3+4) tumors, which was largely diminished in high-grade (GS=5+5) lesions. Black arrows indicate matched regions across serial tissue sections. Scale bars: upper panels, 100 µm; lower panels, 40 µm. AUCell, area under the recovery curve; GS, Gleason Score; M-CSF, macrophage colony-stimulating factor; PCa, prostate cancer; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TAMs, tumor-associated macrophages.

Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against CD8 (Abcam, ab17147; 1:200), CXCR6 (Abcam, ab8023; 1:100), CXCL16 (ProteinTech Group, 60123-1-Ig; 1:100), CD68 (Abcam, ab125212; 1:200), iNOS (Abcam, ab3523; 1:200), HLA-DRA (ProteinTech Group, 17221-1-AP; 1:100), CD163 (Abcam, ab182422; 1:200), KLF2 (ABclonal, A16480; 1:200), FOXO1 (ProteinTech Group, 18592-1-AP; 1:100), Granzyme B (Thermo Fisher, MA1-80734; 1:100), α-SMA (Abcam, ab5694; 1:100) and AR (Abcam, ab133273; 1:100).

Techniques: Expressing, Marker, Derivative Assay, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Western Blot, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Multiplex Assay, Immunohistochemistry, Saline

IL-10–STAT3–FOXO1 signaling reprograms CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells toward a dysfunctional state. ( A ) Dot plot showing the expression of IL10RA , STAT3 , STAT4 , CXCR6 , and related markers across CD8 + T cell subsets in scRNA-seq data. ( B ) IL-10 pathway activity scores across CD8 + T cell clusters. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. (C, D) Murine splenic CD8 + T cells cultured in a medium containing anti-CD3 (5 µg/mL), anti-CD28 (5 µg/mL), and IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for 48 hours. Following initial activation, cells were maintained in fresh medium supplemented with IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for an additional 7 days. On day 9, cells were treated with 20 ng/mL murine IL-10, IL-15, or STAT3 inhibitor Stattic (2 µM) for 24 hours. The protein expression of STAT3, p-STATS, FOXO1, KLF2, and CXCR6 was assessed by Western blot analysis. (E, F) Flow cytometry of mouse spleen-derived CD8 + T cells shows preferential expression of IL-10R on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells, with upregulation observed following TCR stimulation (anti-CD3/CD28+IL-2, day 10), indicating heightened susceptibility to IL-10-mediated signaling. (G–I) Flow cytometry of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) CD8 + T cells from healthy donors similarly demonstrates enhanced IL-10R expression on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells and its induction on TCR stimulation. ( J ) PCA of bulk RNA-seq. Prostate tissues from Pb-Cre; Pten flox/flox ( T ) and WT mice (n=3/group) were profiled by bulk RNA-seq. PCA separated T (blue) from WT (red) chiefly along PC1 (87.24% variance) and PC2 (5.64%). ( K ) Sample-to-sample distance heatmap. Distance matrix based on transformed expression values shows tight clustering of biological replicates within genotype and clear segregation between T and WT. ( L ) Volcano plot. Differential expression analysis between T and WT (cut-offs |log2FC|≥1.5, FDR<0.05). Points are colored by direction (Up=red; Down=blue). Dashed lines indicate thresholds. Il10 , Mrc1 , Cd163 , and Cxcr6 are highlighted in purple; other selected genes are labeled as indicated. Y-axis shows –log 10 (adjusted p). ( M ) Multiplex immunofluorescence (human prostate). Representative fields from human prostate specimens (n=9). Channels: DAPI (nuclei), CD68 (pan-macrophage), HLA-DRA (M1-like macrophage), CD163 (M2-like macrophage), and IL-10. IL-10 signal is enriched in tumor regions and co-localizes with CD68 + CD163 + macrophages. Scale bar: 20 µm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FDR, false discovery rate; PCA, principal component analysis; scRNA-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing; WT, wild-type.

Journal: Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer

Article Title: Dual regulation of CXCR6+CD8+ T cells modulates cytotoxic and exhaustion-associated programs during prostate cancer progression

doi: 10.1136/jitc-2025-014276

Figure Lengend Snippet: IL-10–STAT3–FOXO1 signaling reprograms CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells toward a dysfunctional state. ( A ) Dot plot showing the expression of IL10RA , STAT3 , STAT4 , CXCR6 , and related markers across CD8 + T cell subsets in scRNA-seq data. ( B ) IL-10 pathway activity scores across CD8 + T cell clusters. Kruskal-Wallis test, ****p<0.0001. (C, D) Murine splenic CD8 + T cells cultured in a medium containing anti-CD3 (5 µg/mL), anti-CD28 (5 µg/mL), and IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for 48 hours. Following initial activation, cells were maintained in fresh medium supplemented with IL-2 (10 ng/mL) for an additional 7 days. On day 9, cells were treated with 20 ng/mL murine IL-10, IL-15, or STAT3 inhibitor Stattic (2 µM) for 24 hours. The protein expression of STAT3, p-STATS, FOXO1, KLF2, and CXCR6 was assessed by Western blot analysis. (E, F) Flow cytometry of mouse spleen-derived CD8 + T cells shows preferential expression of IL-10R on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells, with upregulation observed following TCR stimulation (anti-CD3/CD28+IL-2, day 10), indicating heightened susceptibility to IL-10-mediated signaling. (G–I) Flow cytometry of human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) CD8 + T cells from healthy donors similarly demonstrates enhanced IL-10R expression on CXCR6 + CD8 + T cells and its induction on TCR stimulation. ( J ) PCA of bulk RNA-seq. Prostate tissues from Pb-Cre; Pten flox/flox ( T ) and WT mice (n=3/group) were profiled by bulk RNA-seq. PCA separated T (blue) from WT (red) chiefly along PC1 (87.24% variance) and PC2 (5.64%). ( K ) Sample-to-sample distance heatmap. Distance matrix based on transformed expression values shows tight clustering of biological replicates within genotype and clear segregation between T and WT. ( L ) Volcano plot. Differential expression analysis between T and WT (cut-offs |log2FC|≥1.5, FDR<0.05). Points are colored by direction (Up=red; Down=blue). Dashed lines indicate thresholds. Il10 , Mrc1 , Cd163 , and Cxcr6 are highlighted in purple; other selected genes are labeled as indicated. Y-axis shows –log 10 (adjusted p). ( M ) Multiplex immunofluorescence (human prostate). Representative fields from human prostate specimens (n=9). Channels: DAPI (nuclei), CD68 (pan-macrophage), HLA-DRA (M1-like macrophage), CD163 (M2-like macrophage), and IL-10. IL-10 signal is enriched in tumor regions and co-localizes with CD68 + CD163 + macrophages. Scale bar: 20 µm. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; FDR, false discovery rate; PCA, principal component analysis; scRNA-seq, single-cell RNA sequencing; WT, wild-type.

Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against CD8 (Abcam, ab17147; 1:200), CXCR6 (Abcam, ab8023; 1:100), CXCL16 (ProteinTech Group, 60123-1-Ig; 1:100), CD68 (Abcam, ab125212; 1:200), iNOS (Abcam, ab3523; 1:200), HLA-DRA (ProteinTech Group, 17221-1-AP; 1:100), CD163 (Abcam, ab182422; 1:200), KLF2 (ABclonal, A16480; 1:200), FOXO1 (ProteinTech Group, 18592-1-AP; 1:100), Granzyme B (Thermo Fisher, MA1-80734; 1:100), α-SMA (Abcam, ab5694; 1:100) and AR (Abcam, ab133273; 1:100).

Techniques: Expressing, Activity Assay, Cell Culture, Activation Assay, Western Blot, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay, RNA Sequencing, Transformation Assay, Quantitative Proteomics, Labeling, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Single Cell